2027: Vol 3, No 1: Online first section
Articles

Application of the Qualitative Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model DEX in the Selection of Media for Informing Affected Populations in Emergency Situations

Katarina Janković
General staff of the Serbian armed forces, Development and equipment directorate j-5, Technical testing center, weapons and military equipment testing center, Nikinci, Serbia
Milica Mladenović
Regional Association for Security and Crisis Management, Belgrade, Serbia
Nenad Komazec
Regional Association for Security and Crisis Management, Belgrade, Serbia

Published 2026-07-29

Keywords

  • Emergency situations,
  • DEX method,
  • Media,
  • Informing

How to Cite

Janković, K., Mladenović, M., & Komazec, N. (2026). Application of the Qualitative Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model DEX in the Selection of Media for Informing Affected Populations in Emergency Situations. Applied Decision Analytics, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.66972/ada202733

Abstract

Emergency situations represent one of the most prevalent phenomena with a threatening character when societal security is concerned. Prevention occupies the most important position within the system of protection and rescue of people and material assets. The transmission of a signal about an impending danger is of exceptional importance. Therefore, the decision regarding which medium should be used to transmit the signal is crucial, particularly in terms of speed and accessibility. This paper examines the possibilities for selecting media through which endangered populations can be informed in emergency situations, taking into account the required qualitative characteristics of individual media. The DEX method was applied to analyze the applicability of specific media, as it enables the establishment of criteria and the determination of their interdependencies in relation to combinations of criteria. The particular significance of this method lies in the fact that the analysis does not rely on assumed scenarios, but on the knowledge and needs of a real system. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Emergency situations. (2009). Anthology.
  2. European Commission. (2010). Risk assessment and mapping guidelines for disaster management (SEC(2010) 1626). Brussels.
  3. Karović, S., & Komazec, N. (2009). Crisis and Crisis Management. Belgrade, Serbia: Novi Glasnik. (in Serbian).
  4. Law on Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management. (2018). Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 87/2018. (in Serbian).
  5. Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., & Komazec, N. (2016). Risk assessment of natural disasters using fuzzy logic system of type 2. Management – Journal for Theory and Practice Management, 21(80), 23-34.
  6. Radojković, M., & Miletić, M. (2005). Communication, Media and Society. Novi Sad, Serbia: Stylos. (in Serbian).
  7. Sandra, M., Mitchell, N., & Wells, W. D. (2012). Advertising & IMC: Principles and practice (9th ed.). England: Pearson Education.
  8. Komazec, N., Mladenović, M., & Dabižljević, S. (2018). Etiology of the notion of event in terms of decision-making and determination of organizational system risk conditions. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(1), 165-184.
  9. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  10. Butler, J., Jia, J., & Dyer, J. (1997). Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models. European Journal of Operational Research, 103(3), 531-546.
  11. Karleuša, B., Hajdinger, A., & Tadić, L. (2018). Use of multicriteria analysis method DEXi to define priorities in implementation of irrigation plans. Proceedings.
  12. Bohanec, M., et al. (2013). DEX methodology: Three decades of qualitative multi-attribute modeling. Informatica, 37.
  13. Suknović, M. (2010). Business Intelligence and Decision Support Systems. Belgrade, Serbia: Faculty of Organizational Sciences. (in Serbian).
  14. Bohanec, M. (2015). DEXi: A program for multi-attribute decision making (Version 5.05en). https://kt.ijs.si/MarkoBohanec/dexi.html.
  15. Bohanec, M. DEXi: A program for multi-attribute decision making. Jožef Stefan Institute. https://kt.ijs.si/MarkoBohanec/dexi.html.
  16. Suknović, M., Delibašić, B., Jovanović, M., Vukićević, M., & Radovanović, S. (2021). Decision Making. Belgrade, Serbia: Faculty of Organizational Sciences. (in Serbian).
  17. Komazec, N., Janković, K., Mladenović, M., Mijatović, M., & Lapčević, Z. (2024). Application of the AHP method in risk assessment on the Piraeus–Belgrade–Budapest railway corridor within the "Belt and Road" initiative. In Proceedings of the 10th International Scientific-Professional Conference – Security and Crisis Management – Theory and Practice (SeCMan) (pp. 365-375). Regional Association for Security and Crisis Management & S4 GLOSEC Global Security.
  18. Hu, H., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Shang, C., & Zhang, S. (2019). Multi-objective location-routing model for hazardous material logistics with traffic restriction constraints in inter-city roads. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 128, 861-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.044
  19. Zheng, Q., Lyu, H., Zhou, A., & Shen, S. (2021). Risk assessment of geohazards along Cheng-Kun railway using fuzzy AHP incorporated into GIS. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 12, 1508-1531.
```